Re: Twitter buzz about papers does not mean citations later
It's interesting that citations are used as the "gold standard" that other metrics are compared to, despite the frequent criticisms of the JIF, which is based on citations.
View ArticleRe: Twitter buzz about papers does not mean citations later
Well criticisms of the JIF often focus on it being a journal-level-metric, not an article-level-metric. So a research paper is judged by the journal where it appears, which is a misleading...
View ArticleRe: Twitter buzz about papers does not mean citations later
It's interesting that citations are used as the "gold standard" that other metrics are compared to, despite the frequent criticisms of the JIF, which is based on citations.
View ArticleRe: Twitter buzz about papers does not mean citations later
Well criticisms of the JIF often focus on it being a journal-level-metric, not an article-level-metric. So a research paper is judged by the journal where it appears, which is a misleading...
View ArticleRe: Twitter buzz about papers does not mean citations later
It's interesting that citations are used as the "gold standard" that other metrics are compared to, despite the frequent criticisms of the JIF, which is based on citations.
View ArticleRe: Twitter buzz about papers does not mean citations later
Well criticisms of the JIF often focus on it being a journal-level-metric, not an article-level-metric. So a research paper is judged by the journal where it appears, which is a misleading...
View Article
